The Glare Design Assessment helps teams spot weak validation, stakeholder friction, alignment gaps, and assumptions that scale without measurable learning—so you have a clearer starting point for improvement.
About 5 minutes · Team-based · Diagnostic snapshot you can act on
Take the Design AssessmentLooks at whether market research is needed before building a Minimum Viable Product, weighing the cost of research against the risk of building the wrong thing. Useful when leaders debate skipping research to move faster on an MVP.
Argues the MVP is the wrong tool for finding weak spots and offers RAT — the Riskiest Assumption Test — which scores each assumption by probability of being wrong times impact, then tests the top one. Useful when a team is racing to build an MVP but has not asked which single assumption could kill the idea.
Carwow's product team shares how they list every assumption behind a feature, score them by risk, and design cheap tests for the riskiest ones before building. Useful when a team is about to invest in a new feature and wants to avoid building something the market will not want.