GLARE / SIGNAL CALL RUBRIC
Playground Tool

Most meetings feel productive. Almost none lead to decisions.

SIGNAL gives product and design teams a system to turn conversations into clear outcomes, grounded decisions, and real momentum.

Try the SIGNAL RubricGet your SIGNAL score in 2 minutes.
The Problem

Teams have no idea if their meetings are actually effective.

Most teams don’t have a system for making decisions — they just have conversations. The result feels productive in the room, then unravels the moment everyone closes their laptop.

01

You leave with "alignment"… then everything reopens later

Decisions made in the meeting get re-litigated in Slack the next morning. The momentum you thought you had evaporates by Wednesday.

02

Stakeholders debate opinions instead of outcomes

Without a shared definition of success, the loudest voice wins. Conversations drift into preference rather than what actually moves the metric.

03

Teams talk about work instead of impact

Status updates replace strategic conversation. The team reports what they shipped, not whether it changed anything for the business.

04

Decisions feel soft, reversible, or political

No one's quite sure what was decided, who owns what, or whether the next exec to weigh in will overturn it. Everything stays in suspended motion.

The AI Acceleration Problem

AI is making it easy to move fast — and easier to move in the wrong direction.

SIGNAL helps teams slow down just enough to make the right decisions before they scale. Because shipping the wrong thing in half the time is still shipping the wrong thing.

The Framework

Six moves that turn conversations into decisions.

SIGNAL is a call rubric that helps product and design teams turn conversations into decisions. It gives you a clear structure to surface real problems, define measurable outcomes, ground decisions in evidence, secure agreement, create accountability, and keep momentum.

Every conversation should leave the work in a better place than it started.

S
Surface Challenges

Expose the real problem behind the request. Most conversations stay at the surface.

I
Identify Outcomes

Define what success actually looks like. Without clear outcomes, teams debate deliverables.

G
Ground in Signals

Use data and evidence to guide decisions. Signals replace opinion and reduce politics.

N
Navigate Decisions

Lead the room to a clear decision. If you don't secure it in the room, it reopens later.

A
Align Ownership

Clarify who owns what. Ambiguity creates drift and slows everything down.

L
Lock Momentum

Turn the conversation into action. Without momentum, even good decisions die.

// What every great conversation produces
Real problems
Measurable outcomes
Evidence over opinion
Secured agreement
Clear accountability
Forward momentum
The Toolkit

Get the SIGNAL Toolkit.

Three companion artifacts that take SIGNAL from idea to practice. Use them before the meeting, during the meeting, and after the meeting.

01 · CALL RUBRIC

Call Rubric

A 30-point scoring system across the six SIGNAL dimensions. Score yourself, score a teammate, or score the whole room.

30 POINTS · 6 DIMENSIONS · < 2 MIN
02 · QUESTION PROMPTS

Question Prompts

The exact phrasing that surfaces real stakes, exposes hidden assumptions, and pushes the room toward a decision without friction.

42 PROMPTS · GROUPED BY SIGNAL
03 · POST-CALL ANALYSIS

Post-Call Framework

Translate every meeting into decisions, owners, signals, and next steps — in a format your team can scan in 30 seconds.

1 PAGE · COPY-PASTE READY

SIGNAL teaches your team to lead the room.

Ask questions that expose real stakes
Translate ideas into measurable outcomes
Use signals to remove debate
Push for decisions without friction
Why This Matters

The real issue isn’t one call. It’s how decisions get made across the org.

The Symptoms

What teams experience today

SIGNAL helps you run a better conversation. But most teams don’t struggle with one call — they struggle with how decisions get made everywhere.

Meetings drift
Decisions reopen
Stakeholders override
Teams move fast without clarity
The Glare Approach

Fix the system, not just the call

Instead of hoping each person runs a better call, you give your team a shared way to think, decide, and lead.

Define problems, not just symptoms
Make decisions stick
Use signals instead of opinions
Build alignment with stakeholders
Prove impact to the business
That’s not a call issue. That’s a system issue.
What the Engagement Feels Like

We don’t run workshops and disappear.

We work directly with your product and design leaders, week by week, on actual calls and real situations. Small changes. Real situations. Measurable progress.

Week 01 — 02

Review actual calls

Bring transcripts from real meetings. We score them against SIGNAL together — no generic frameworks, your situations.

Week 03 — 04

Identify where things break

Spot the recurring failure modes — Where decisions slip. Where ownership blurs. Where outcomes never get defined.

Week 05 — 08

Improve how decisions get made

Run the next round of calls with new prompts and structure. Re-score. See the shift in real conversations.

Ongoing

Compound week over week

Decisions stick. Meetings tighten. Stakeholders trust the process. The team starts running this themselves.

Small changes.Real situations.Measurable progress.
See it on a real call

From scattered transcript to scored evidence

Here’s a 90-second excerpt from an actual roadmap review — and the Identify dimension of the scorecard it produced. Every score comes with the quote that earned it.

BEFORE RAW TRANSCRIPT
14:02PMWe need to ship the new onboarding by end of Q3. Engineering is locked in.
14:18DESIGNER
Before we lock the date — what outcome are we trying to drive? Activation, or completion?↳ Surfaces the missing outcome
14:24PMHonestly… we haven’t defined that yet.
14:31DESIGNER
Then let’s pick one before we commit a quarter. Activation gives us a different scope than completion.↳ Forces a measurable outcome before momentum
14:42PMYeah. That would actually save us six weeks of arguing later.
AFTER SCORED · 1.4s
Surface
4.2
Identify
4.5
Ground
3.0
IDENTIFY · 4.5/5 — Narrative Assessment

Strong outcome move at 14:18 — the designer refused to accept a delivery date without a defined success metric, surfacing that activation vs. completion would change scope entirely. At 14:31, forced a measurable outcome before the team committed a quarter of engineering capacity. Not a 5 because the actual metric was named but not numbered before the conversation moved on.

2 evidence quotes · 1 gap flagged · mapped to SIGNAL: Identify Outcomes
Want to see how this applies to your team?

Let’s walk through one of your calls and show you exactly where decisions break down.

We’ll score a real meeting from your team against SIGNAL — and show you, in concrete terms, what to fix and how. No pitch deck. No generic advice.

AI is making it easy to build anything. You can waste time faster than ever.

Glare helps you decide what’s worth building — and prove it before the wrong decisions scale.